<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Shuttersounds &#187; D300s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/tag/d300s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com</link>
	<description>Photographic adoxography at its finest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Past three months in camera news: Nikon</title>
		<link>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/10/16/past-three-months-in-camera-news-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/10/16/past-three-months-in-camera-news-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200mm f/2.8 VR II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO100k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO102400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apologies to all for dropping the ball for the past three months &#8211; it&#8217;s been a whirlwind start to the semester here. Big, recent developments:
Nikon SLR Refresh
Nikon introduced a couple of new SLR updates, the updated D300s and D3s. The D300 is a pretty incremental upgrade to the mid-level D300, offering a modest +1fps improvement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies to all for dropping the ball for the past three months &#8211; it&#8217;s been a whirlwind start to the semester here. Big, recent developments:</p>
<h2>Nikon SLR Refresh</h2>
<p>Nikon introduced a couple of new SLR updates, the updated D300s and D3s. The D300 is a pretty incremental upgrade to the mid-level D300, offering a modest +1fps improvement in continuous shooting (up to 7fps), and bringing the video capability that&#8217;s now standard on every new DSLR.</p>
<p>The bigger story came a few months later, in the form of the D3s. While still not a revolutionary introduction, it is much more than a software refresh. Among the features of note were a video mode (at 24fps!, albeit only at 1280&#215;720 (720p) resolution), 11fps available in a higher-res crop mode (it now crops only 1.2x instead of 1.5x), and an increase in ISO range, up to ISO12.8k natively with a boost to ISO100k. The D3s presumably packs a different sensor, though it still maintains the same 12.1MP resolution.</p>
<p>People have been going goo-gah over the last spec in particular, especially given such a high linear number for ISO (and from here, it&#8217;s just four more stops til we get to ISO1.6 MILLION), though it&#8217;s really just +1 stop natively and +2 stop boost over the previous D3. And it&#8217;s important to note that the simple availability of an ISO capability says nothing about image quality at that level &#8211; that would be the same mistake as having the maximum shutter speed expanded from 30 seconds to a minute, and somehow thinking this magically makes photos at 1/500s less blurry. Given that the resolution (and thus pixel pitch) remained the exact same, I certainly wouldn&#8217;t expect quality to be any <em>worse</em> than the D3, and quite probably will be a tad better (although I have extreme doubts about the ISO100k mode, which is digitally boosted 3 stops; things have always looked terrible at just +2 stops digitally, even boosting ISO100+2 to 400.)</p>
<p>All in all, about as much as you could expect from Nikon, who seems to do very incremental updates and waits a long time to deliver big, revolutionary refreshes. Here&#8217;s hoping we see that D3s sensor in a D700s soon, though 1080p at 24fps would be nice (and completely feasible: 1920&#215;1080x24fps = 49.8MP/s throughput, while we definitely know that the D700 supports 12.1MPx9fps = 108.9MP/s throughput in its continuous shooting mode).</p>
<p><a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2009/10/the_imaging_evolution_continue.php#more">Nikon D3s press release</a> (I don&#8217;t know why they keep referring to it as &#8220;D3S&#8221;, past history and even the logo in the image clearly denote &#8220;D3s&#8221;)</p>
<div id="attachment_396" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 805px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-396 " title="d3s_ambience_2_795px" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/d3s_ambience_2_795px.jpg" alt="The Nikon DS3, now with 720p video and ISO up to 12.8K/100K(boost)" width="795" height="434" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Nikon DS3, now with 720p video and ISO up to 12.8K/100K(boost)</p></div>
<p>Nikon also announced a couple of lens refreshes, with Version II&#8217;s of their popular 18-200mm VR ultrazoom and a long-awaited update to the 70-200 f/2.8 VR to optimize it for full-frame (FX) sensors. As Nikon had long trumpeted 1.5x crop DX sensors before their introduction of the full-frame D3 in 2007, they cut corners with their introduction of the 70-200 f/2.8 VR in 2003, building a lens that was technically full-frame but had an abysmal drop-off in performance once you actually got to the corners outside of a 1.5x imaging circle. This wasn&#8217;t found out until a bit after the D3 was released, finally giving digital photographers a platform to test the lens&#8217; full frame performance, which resulted in tests like these:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_70-200_2p8_vr_n15/page6.asp">http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_70-200_2p8_vr_n15/page6.asp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/widget/Fullscreen.ashx?reviews=17&amp;fullscreen=true&amp;av=3&amp;fl=105&amp;vis=VisualiserSharpnessMTF&amp;stack=horizontal&amp;lock=&amp;config=/lensreviews/widget/LensReviewConfiguration.xml%3F4">http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/widget/Fullscreen.ashx?reviews=17&amp;fullscreen=true&amp;av=3&amp;fl=105&amp;vis=VisualiserSharpnessMTF&amp;stack=horizontal&amp;lock=&amp;config=/lensreviews/widget/LensReviewConfiguration.xml%3F4</a></p>
<p>The new 70-200 II promises to fix all of these problems with a new optical design and coatings, and promises to throw in a more effective &#8220;4-stop&#8221; VR system as well. There haven&#8217;t been too many authoritative tests yet to show how it performs (if you&#8217;ve found any, send me a link!), but presumably they should have no problem building such a lens &#8211; Canon has had two 70-200 2.8&#8217;s that&#8217;ve performed flawlessly on full-frame, and Nikon itself had a great 80-200 2.8 lens prior to the 70-200 VR I.</p>
<p>The one stickler? As if Nikon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-70-200mm-Nikkor-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00009MDBQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1255720046&amp;sr=8-1">$2019 price on the original 70-200 I</a> wasn&#8217;t enough, the 70-200 VR II will now <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-70-200mm-VR-II-Digital/dp/B002JCSV8U/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1255720046&amp;sr=8-2">set you back a cool $2400</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2009/07/nikon_further_refines_dx_and_f.php#more">Nikon 18-200 II and 70-200 2.8 VR II press release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/10/16/past-three-months-in-camera-news-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
