<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Shuttersounds &#187; simple ultracompact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/tag/simple-ultracompact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com</link>
	<description>Photographic adoxography at its finest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:05:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Camera Guide, November 2010 Part 1 (Consumer compacts)</title>
		<link>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2010/11/24/camera-guide-november-2010-part-1-consumer-compacts/</link>
		<comments>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2010/11/24/camera-guide-november-2010-part-1-consumer-compacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SD1300 IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SD3500 IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic ZR3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic ZS5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple ultracompact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony HX5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workhorse compact]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re nearing the holiday shopping season once again, so as an exercise to familiarize myself with all the product lines out there (a lot has changed in the 17 months since I did the last one) and to provide a one-stop quick read for digital camera recommendations, here are recommendations for cameras that run the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re nearing the holiday shopping season once again, so as an exercise to familiarize myself with all the product lines out there (a lot has changed in the 17 months since I did the <a href="/2009/06/07/camera-guide-june-2009/">last one</a>) and to provide a one-stop quick read for digital camera recommendations, here are recommendations for cameras that run the gamut of common use-cases and prices.</p>
<p>All prices are based on the lowest of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">amazon.com</a> or <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/">bhphotovideo.com</a></p>
<p>Have you got a use case/need that isn&#8217;t covered here?  Feel free to post it in the comments, and I&#8217;ll keep it in mind for future guides (or maybe update this guide, if there&#8217;s a glaring omission in a category).  And if you think differently about any of the cameras, feel free to share that too!</p>
<h1>General advice:</h1>
<p>To give you all an idea of the perspective these recommendations are written from, here are a few guidelines I mostly go by:</p>
<p><strong>Features trump image quality:</strong> With modern cameras, many image quality differences are mostly a consideration of the past.  Almost every camera released today has megapixel resolution far in excess of what&#8217;s needed (or even usable) for the majority of applications (like making a 4&#215;6&#8243; print, uploading to Facebook, or even displaying full-size on the biggest computer monitor or LCD screen you can buy), and in most daylight scenarios there is practically zero difference between cameras, especially among the top tier of manufacturers.  The main differentiator in your photographic experience and capability is what features you&#8217;ll have to work with &#8211; being able to take a wide shot with a 28mm wide-angle lens, or having a fast 5fps continuous shooting mode for action shots, for instance, is going to go a long way towards getting you the photographs you want, compared to minute differences in image quality or resolution.</p>
<p><strong>Price/performance:</strong> The recommendations for different categories will mostly recommend the camera with the best value proposition &#8211; a lot of these are often written in the format of: Best budget camera under $200, best midrange camera under $300, best premium camera under $500, etc. While oftentimes, yes it&#8217;s true that Camera Xa has a slightly bigger LCD screen than Camera Xb and is therefore better, and the $50 premium still puts it under the $300 budget, as a knowledgeable consumer you wouldn&#8217;t want to spend that much more on a mostly cosmetic difference, and as an informed friend you would do best by recommending Camera Xb to your friend.</p>
<h1>Simple Ultracompact</h1>
<p>For many people, cameras are just cameras, and all they need is something that, for lack of a less-hackneyed phrase, they can &#8220;point and shoot&#8221;.  They&#8217;re not interested in photography and don&#8217;t need nor want full manual controls, and can make do without a huge zoom range.  They&#8217;ll take snaps while they&#8217;re out at social events or just randomly at home or in their room, but that&#8217;s about it.  For this group there&#8217;s thesimple ultracompact - a basic camera that has a few useful features (wide-angle lenses for photos in restricted interior space &#8211; group photos at a restaurant, for example - and image stabilization for low-light situations) but otherwise just provides good overall quality and a small formfactor that can be taken just about anywhere.</p>
<h2>Simple Ultracompact, midrange: Canon SD3500 IS</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-483" title="Canon SD3500 IS" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/canon_sd3500_300px.jpg" alt="Canon SD3500 IS" width="300" height="196" />For years, Canon&#8217;s iconic SD line has been the quintessential ultracompact point and shoot, and their popularity has good reason: they deliver solid image quality, decent featureset, no-frills point-and-shoot control, and aren&#8217;t overly expensive.  The SD3500 is one of the better featured packages available, providing a 5x lens with extremely versatile 24mm wide-angle (perfect for taking photos indoors and getting everything in the frame), 720p HD video resolution, and the increasingly common image stabilized lens.</p>
<ul>
<li>14MP resolution</li>
<li>24-120mm (5x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/2.8-5.9 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 30fps video (720p)</li>
<li>Lens-based Image stabilization</li>
<li>160g (5.6oz)</li>
<li>99 x 56 x 22 mm (3.9 x 2.2 x 0.9 in)</li>
<li>220 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SD3500IS-Stabilized-Black/dp/B0035FZJIK/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1290324307&amp;sr=8-2">$249 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><span id="more-476"></span>Simple Ultracompact, budget: Canon SD1300 IS</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-485" title="Canon SD1300 IS" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/canon_sd1300_300px1.jpg" alt="Canon SD1300 IS" width="300" height="212" />The Canon SD1300 IS is a simplified version of the SD3500 &#8211; image quality is not quite as sharp; its 28mm wide-angle lens is still useful but not <em>quite</em> as versatile as a 24mm; and it produces only 640&#215;480 video instead of 1280&#215;720 HD video. It also uses standard physical buttons in its control scheme, instead of the pure touchscreen interface of the SD3500 &#8211; a minus in the fancy-tricks-you-show-off-at-parties category, but probably a plus for everyday usability.  Nonetheless, it fulfills the common use cases of the simple budget ultracompact, and does it with consistent image quality for a surprisingly low price (even among budget cameras).</p>
<ul>
<li>12MP resolution</li>
<li>28-112mm (4x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/2.8-5.9 aperture</li>
<li>640&#215;480, 30fps video</li>
<li>Lens-based Image stabilization</li>
<li>117g (4.1oz)</li>
<li>91 x 56 x 20 mm (3.6 x 2.2 x 0.8 in)</li>
<li>240 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Stabilized-2-7-Inch-Silver/dp/B0035FZJKI/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1290330604&amp;sr=1-1">$129 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>Workhorse Compact</h1>
<p>While simple ultracompacts make great cameras for casual snapshots, they don&#8217;t quite meet the needs of avid picture takers.  A casual user might go to a party and take three or four photos with her friends the whole night, and might not care about quality so long as they&#8217;re passable for Facebook.  The avid user is the family photographer for the annual camping trip to Yosemite &#8211; they may not exactly aspire to be the next Ansel Adams, but will take in the neighborhood of hundreds of pictures to document and remember the whole trip.  The workhorse compact is the ideal camera for these users &#8211; good, versatile cameras with the capability to handle a large number of common situations, from daylight to low-light, and up-close photos in cramped interiors to outdoor graduation ceremonies from half a soccer field away, while still retaining fairly simple functionality and a portable formfactor.</p>
<h2>Workhorse Compact, midrange: Sony HX5</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-484" title="Sony HX5" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sony_hx5_300px.jpg" alt="Sony HX5" width="300" height="211" /></p>
<p>While the Panasonic ZS/TZ cameras are the best-known in this category, the slightly more upscale Sony HX5 offers improved image quality (especially in low-light situations) and a number of useful features enabled by its high-speed back-illuminated CMOS sensor.  Featuring a 10x lens with a very versatile 25mm wide-angle, the HX5 has the zoom range to cover practically any situation.</p>
<p>The HX5 also excels in low-light situations.  In addition to its lens-based image stabilization, the high-ISO ability of the HX5&#8242;s back-illuminated CMOS sensor outperforms all the other CCD-based cameras in this category, and has even further low-light capability when used in a multi-sampling mode to reduce noise (Sony calls this &#8220;Handheld Twilight&#8221;).</p>
<p>The HX5 also packs a couple of unique features for travelers: the camera has an onboard GPS which adds coordinate information to the metadata of all images (as well as software to sync this data with Google Maps), and an automated &#8220;panorama mode&#8221; which simply works by literally waving the camera across the scene in front of you (although experienced panorama photographers should note that it only produces ~7MP images, instead of the full-resolution from stitching images manually).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a feature-laden camera with supreme versatility and especially impressive low-light performance, making it a nearly perfect workhorse camera for the most common and most difficult photographs.</p>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>25-250mm (10x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.5-5.5 aperture</li>
<li>1920&#215;1080, 30fps video (1080p)</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>170g (6.0oz)</li>
<li>104 x 61 x 31 mm (4.1 x 2.4 x 1.2 in)</li>
<li>310 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-HX5V-Digital-Optical-Stabilization/dp/B00328HR76/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1290339557&amp;sr=1-1">$299 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Workhorse Compact, midrange: Panasonic ZR3</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-486" title="Panasonic ZR3" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/panasonic_zr3_300px.jpg" alt="Panasonic ZR3" width="300" height="216" />The smaller sibling of the popular TZ/ZS compact ultrazooms, Panasonic&#8217;s ZR series achieves even further feats of compactness by offering a versatile 25-200mm (8x) zoom lens into an ultracompact-size body.  Despite squeezing itself into such a tiny package (it&#8217;s exactly an inch thick), the ZR3 features all the essential capabilities of a TS/ZS series camera &#8211; expansive zoom range and wide-angle lens, and Panasonic&#8217;s image stabilization system (arguably the best IS system for blur reduction), 720p HD video, &#8211; making it a near-perfect travel companion.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really interested in the long end of the zoom range or need further exposure controls, and can live with an average-size compact rather than an ultracompact, the Panasonic ZS5 (<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/673680-REG/Panasonic_DMC_ZS5K_LUMIX_DMC_ZS5_Digital_Camera.html">$215 on B&amp;H</a>) bumps up the zoom range to a 25-300mm lens (12x) that also features a larger telephoto aperture (more light at the long end of the zoom, and less problems in lower-light situations), and provides users with full exposure program controls (including a full manual exposure mode).</p>
<ul>
<li>14MP resolution</li>
<li>25-200mm (10x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.3-5.9 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 30fps video (720p)</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>137g (4.8oz)</li>
<li>99 x 56 x 25 mm (3.9 x 2.2 x 1.0 in)</li>
<li>330 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/673700-REG/Panasonic_DMC_ZR3K_LUMIX_DMC_ZR3_Digital_Camera.html">$179 on B&amp;H PHoto</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Up next: Consumer categories (simple and workhorse again), for those without size restrictions (i.e. entry-level DSLRs and bridge-type superzooms)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2010/11/24/camera-guide-november-2010-part-1-consumer-compacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera Guide, June 2009</title>
		<link>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/06/07/camera-guide-june-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/06/07/camera-guide-june-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bestinclass.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Rebel XS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SD960]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujifilm F200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujifilm F200EXR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-performance compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic FS15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic FZ28]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic LX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic TZ4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic ZS1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic ZS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax K2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point and shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma 18-200mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma DP1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple ultracompact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrazoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workhorse camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get a lot of questions all the time about which camera to buy, and most of the time I don&#8217;t quite have the time to respond to all of them, so I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;d start a regular camera guide feature.  These aren&#8217;t in-depth rationales or anything, just quick summaries that tell you, unequivocally, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of questions all the time about which camera to buy, and most of the time I don&#8217;t quite have the time to respond to all of them, so I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;d start a regular camera guide feature.  These aren&#8217;t in-depth rationales or anything, just quick summaries that tell you, unequivocally, which is the best of the best; I also write <a href="http://www.bestinclass.com/digital-cameras">digital camera recommendations for a site called bestinclass.com</a> &#8211; I might recommend visiting there if you&#8217;re looking for more in-depth analyses and comparisons.</p>
<p>Digital cameras don&#8217;t come out all that often, so this may be a quarterly guide.  This also may not reflect the very cutting edge &#8211; it takes a little while for reviews for the newest cameras to come in, and it&#8217;s impossible to really assess the cameras until they do.</p>
<p>All prices based on the lowest of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/">amazon.com</a> or <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/">bhphotovideo.com</a></p>
<p>Have you got a use case/need that isn&#8217;t covered here?  Feel free to post it in the comments, and I&#8217;ll keep it in mind for future guides.  And if you think differently about any of the cameras, feel free to share that too!</p>
<h1>General advice:</h1>
<p>To give you all an idea of the perspective these recommendations are written from, here&#8217;s a few guidelines I mostly go by:</p>
<p><strong>Features trump image quality:</strong> With modern cameras, image quality differences are mostly a consideration of the past.  Almost every camera released today has megapixel resolution far in excess of what&#8217;s needed (or even usable) for most applications, and in most daylight scenarios there is practically zero difference between cameras, especially among the top tier of manufacturers.  The main differentiator in your photographic experience and capability, then, is what features you&#8217;ll have to work with &#8211; being able to take a wide shot with a 28mm wide-angle lens, or having a fast 4fps continuous shooting mode for action shots, for instance, is going to go a long way towards getting you the photographs you want compared to minute differences in image quality or resolution.</p>
<p><strong>Price/performance:</strong> The recommendations for different categories will mostly recommend the camera with the best value proposition &#8211; a lot of these are often written in the format of: Best budget camera under $200, best midrange camera under $300, best premium camera under $500, etc. While oftentimes, yes it&#8217;s true that Camera Xa has a slightly bigger LCD screen than Camera Xb and is therefore better, and the $50 premium still puts it under the $300 budget, as a knowledgeable consumer you wouldn&#8217;t want to spend that much more on a mostly cosmetic difference, and as an informed friend you would do best by recommending Camera Xb to your friend.</p>
<h1>Simple Ultracompact</h1>
<p>For many people, cameras are just cameras, and all they need is something that, for lack of a less-hackneyed phrase, they can &#8220;point and shoot&#8221;.  They&#8217;re not interested in photography and don&#8217;t need nor want full manual controls, and rarely would use and can make do without a huge zoom range.  They&#8217;ll take snaps while they&#8217;re out at social events or just randomly at home or in their room, but that&#8217;s about it.  For this group there&#8217;s the <strong>simple ultracompact</strong> &#8211; a basic camera that has a few useful features (possibly wide-angle lenses for indoor group photos and image stabilization for low-light situations) but otherwise just provides good overall quality and a small formfactor that can be slipped just about anywhere.</p>
<h2>Simple Ultracompact, midrange: Canon SD960</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-360" title="canon-sd960" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/canon-sd960.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="188" />A plethora of Canon, Panasonic, and Fujifilm cameras rule the roost in the ultracompact category, all roaming around the $300 range.  For a little less than $300, Canon&#8217;s SD960 puts together the best combination of image quality and features, with a 28mm wide-angle, image stabilization, and even 1280&#215;720 (720p) video capability.</p>
<ul>
<li>12MP resolution</li>
<li>28-112mm (4x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/2.8-5.8 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 30fps video (720p)</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>145g (5.1oz)</li>
<li>99.1 x 53.3 x 22.9 mm (3.9 x 2.1 x 0.9 in)</li>
<li>200 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B001SER46K/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8&amp;m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;v=glance">$281 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><span id="more-356"></span>Simple Ultracompact, budget: Panasonic FS15</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-358" title="panasonic-fs15a" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/panasonic-fs15a.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" />If you&#8217;re looking for cheap and portable, the Panasonic FS15 is the most capable camera around.  For the most part the FS15 is your typical point-and-shoot ultracompact &#8211; it&#8217;s 0.9&#8243; thin and 4.1oz light, so you can definitely take it just about anywhere.  The most prominent features is the 29mm wide-angle lens, allowing you to get a much wider view for sweeping landscapes or cramped indoor group photos.  The FS15 also features an image stabilization system, which helps greatly to reduce camera shake blur in low-light situations.  You&#8217;ll be hard-pressed to find either of these features on an ultracompact this small <em>or</em> a budget camera this cheap, much less both, which is what makes the FS15 by far the most capable camera in its class.</p>
<ul>
<li>12MP resolution</li>
<li>29-145mm (5x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.3-5.9 aperture</li>
<li>840&#215;480, 30fps video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>115g (4.1oz)</li>
<li>96.5 x 53.3 x 22.9mm (3.8 x 2.1 x 0.9 in)</li>
<li>330 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001QFZM74/sr=1-3/qid=1244314113/ref=noref?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1244314113&amp;sr=1-3">$188 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>Workhorse Compact</h1>
<p>While simple ultracompacts make great cameras for casual snapshots, they don&#8217;t quite meet the needs of avid picture takers.  While a casual user might go to a party and want to take three or four photos with her friends the whole night, and might not care about quality so long as they&#8217;re passable for Facebook, the avid user is someone who&#8217;s going on a family trip to Yosemite and doesn&#8217;t exactly aspire to be the next Ansel Adams, but definitely wants to take hundreds of pictures to document and remember the whole trip.  The <strong>workhorse compact</strong> is the ideal camera for these users &#8211; good, versatile cameras with the capability to handle a large number of common situations from daylight to low-light and cramped interiors to outdoor graduations from a distance, while still retaining fairly simple functionality and a smaller formfactor.</p>
<h2>Workhorse Compact, midrange: Panasonic ZS1, Panasonic ZS3</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-363" title="panasonic-zs1" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/panasonic-zs1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="205" />The Panasonic ZS1 and ZS3 are the latest in a line of compact ultrazoom cameras from Panasonic &#8211; both feature big 25-300mm (12x) zoom lenses that provide versatility for long-range photography and a very wide short range that&#8217;s especially useful for landscapes or interiors (the 25mm lens is in fact significantly wider than the kit lenses that come with most DSLRs).  The ZS3 features 1280&#215;720 HD video capture and a higher resolution screen compared to the ZS1 &#8211;  the first might be a worthwhile feature if you&#8217;re interested in taking video as well, although for now it comes at a hefty price premium.</p>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>25-300mm (12x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.3-4.9 aperture</li>
<li>ZS3: 1280&#215;720, 30fps video (720p); ZS1: 848&#215;480, 30fps video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>206g (7.3oz)</li>
<li>104.1 x 61.0 x 33.0 mm (4.1 x 2.4 x 1.3 in)</li>
<li>ZS3: 300 shots battery life (CIPA); ZS1: 320 shots</li>
<li>ZS3: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-ZS3-Digital-Optical-Stabilized/dp/B0021Y4XHY/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1244328253&amp;sr=1-3">$399 on Amazon</a>; ZS1: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-ZS1-Digital-Stabilized-Silver/dp/B001QFZMC4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1244317564&amp;sr=1-1">$260 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Workhorse Compact, budget: Panasonic TZ4</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-359" title="panasonic-tz4" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/panasonic-tz4.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="233" />The Panasonic TZ4 is the previous model in Panasonic&#8217;s series of ultrazoom compacts.  While the newer ZS series cameras provide wider lenses and slightly better high ISO performance, the TZ4 is nothing to scoff at &#8211; no other camera outside the TZ/ZS series provides a 10x zoom in as small of a package as the TZ4, and certainly not for the sub-$200 price of the TZ4.</p>
<ul>
<li>8MP resolution</li>
<li>28-280mm (10x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.3-4.9 aperture</li>
<li>840&#215;480, 30fps video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>208g (7.3oz)</li>
<li>104.1 x 58.4 x 35.6 mm (4.1 x 2.3 x 1.4 in)</li>
<li>330 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/545294-REG/Panasonic_DMC_TZ4K_Lumix_DMC_TZ4_Digital_Camera.html">$190 on B&amp;H</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>High-Performance Compact</h1>
<p>Most users who are highly interested in photography &#8211; both in terms of having a high degree of control and producing the best images possible &#8211; are most likely to be interested in a full-fledged DSLR camera, but there does exist a niche market of <strong>high-performance compacts</strong> for the same user group.  Some might not be quite ready yet to take the plunge into the world of DSLRs, and others may not be interested in the size and micromanagement required of using a DSLR system.  Another common form of user in this group is the actual DSLR user looking for a second &#8220;social&#8221; camera that can be a bit more automated and definitely more pocketable, while still retaining the highest quality and a great amount of user control.  It should be noted that these cameras aren&#8217;t really the easiest to use or most versatile; in many cases they&#8217;re actually very specialized and limited in use, and require a strong technical proficiency to get the most out of the images, but in the right situation and in the right hands, these can be far more capable than your typical compact camera.</p>
<h2>High-Performance Compact, premium: Sigma DP1</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-364" title="sigma-dp1" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sigma-dp1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" />The Sigma DP1 is perhaps the epitome of the high-performance compact category.  It&#8217;s an extremely limited camera &#8211; it&#8217;s only got a fixed 28mm lens (no zooming at all), which makes it ideally suited for landscapes or interior photos, but leaves it absolutely useless for things like sports or other long-range events and doesn&#8217;t provide the working versatility useful for travel or portraiture.  Despite this, it&#8217;s close to a photographer&#8217;s absolute dream in a camera: it packs an extremely large 276mm<sup>2</sup> sensor that enables it to achieve much better noise performance, a very large dynamic range, and provides the option for shallower depth of field compared to nearly every other camera this side of a DSLR.  It also features a RAW mode and a hotshoe for use with external flashes, as well as fully manual exposure controls.  Sigma also makes the DP2, which is the same camera paired with a 41mm f/2.8 lens &#8211; even more specialized for low-light photography and perhaps a bit better for portraiture, but in a bit of a no man&#8217;s land in terms of focal length: a very difficult range to capture landscapes or interior photos, and still not anywhere near close enough for long-range photography.</p>
<ul>
<li>4.6MP resolution</li>
<li>28mm (1x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/4.0 aperture</li>
<li>320&#215;240, 30fps video</li>
<li>No Image stabilization</li>
<li>250g (8.8oz)</li>
<li>114.3 x 58.4 x 50.8 mm (4.5 x 2.3 x 2.0 in)</li>
<li>250 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-DP1-14MP-Digital-Camera/dp/B0013DCOZC/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1244329070&amp;sr=1-3">$444 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
<h2>High-Performance Compact, premium: Panasonic LX3</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-365" title="panasonic-lx3" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/panasonic-lx3.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="205" />The LX3 is the most recent in a line of high-performing and unique Panasonic cameras.  The LX3 concentrates mostly on the wider end of the zoom range: it features a 24-60mm zoom that won&#8217;t zoom very close at all (useless for any kind of sports or long-range event, and not quite passable for good variety in portraiture and travel), but provides one of the widest angles of view on any camera this side of a DSLR system.  The LX3 also features a RAW mode, manual controls, and a hot shoe for external flashes. Quality-wise, the LX3 ranks among the very best non-DSLRs out there, probably only behind the Sigma DP1/DP2 in image quality, and combined with its very large f/2-2.8 aperture lens (which at its widest takes in 4x as much light as the DP1&#8242;s f/4 lens, for instance) makes for arguably the top low-light camera around.</p>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>24-60mm (2.5x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/2.0-2.8 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 30fps video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>229g (8.1oz)</li>
<li>109 x 62 x 38 mm (4.3 x 2.4 x 1.5 in)</li>
<li>380 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573593-REG/Panasonic_DMC_LX3S_Lumix_DMC_LX3_Digital_Camera.html">$430 on B&amp;H</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
<h2>High-Performance Compact, midrange: Fujifilm F200EXR</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-366" title="fuji-f200exr" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fuji-f200exr.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" />At the cutting edge of non-DSLR sensor technology today is Fujifilm&#8217;s SuperCCD EXR sensor, currently found on their F200 EXR ultracompact camera.  The F200 EXR boasts a number of unqiue attributes, chief among them the ability to effectively bin pixels in a lower resolution mode to achieve much higher sensitivity/noise performance, and pixel-variable gain to allow for an extension of dynamic range.  The F200EXR carries the other somewhat standard features you&#8217;d expect in a typical  - 5x zoom with 28mm wide-angle &#8211; and is in fact eclipsed in those areas by a few other cameras, like Panasonic&#8217;s $313 FX48 (which pack 25-125mm (5x) lenses and 720p HD video capture), but it&#8217;s the image quality which puts it a notch above the rest, and decent versatility which makes it an appealing alternative to cameras like the Sigma DP1 and Panasonic LX3 with better versatility.</p>
<ul>
<li>12MP resolution</li>
<li>28-140mm (5x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.3-5.1 aperture</li>
<li>640&#215;480, 30fps</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>175g (6.2oz)</li>
<li>96.5 x 58.4 x 22.9 mm (3.8 x 2.3 x 0.9 in)</li>
<li>230 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-Digital-Stabilized/dp/B001R23JMQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1244320028&amp;sr=1-1">$350 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h1>Simple Full-size</h1>
<p>For some casual snapshooters, size is really no object.  In terms of usage, these users might use a camera very similarly to how they&#8217;d use a simple ultracompact &#8211; snapping a photo or two at social events or taking casual photos around the house or room.  In contrast to a simple ultracompact, a <strong>simple full-size</strong> camera doesn&#8217;t have portability as its main concern &#8211; you probably won&#8217;t be able to stuff it in your jeans pocket, and it might even require its own bag &#8211; but has a larger formfactor which often allows for better overall image quality.</p>
<h3>Simple Full-size, premium: Canon Rebel XS with 18-55 IS lens</h3>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-367" title="canon-rebel-xs" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/canon-rebel-xs.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="279" />The Rebel XS is Canon&#8217;s entry-level DSLR offering.  While it&#8217;s got all the manual controls for more advanced users, like all DSLRs it has an automatic mode that reduces controls to the level of point and shoot.  In its price range, Rebel XS features the top image quality, and unlike some other entry-level models features an 18-55 kit lens with an image stabilization system to help steady low-light images.</p>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>29-88mm (3x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.5-5.6 aperture</li>
<li>No video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>450g (15.9oz) &#8211; not including lens</li>
<li>127.0 x 96.5 x 61.0 mm (5.0 x 3.8 x 2.4 in) &#8211; not including lens</li>
<li>500 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/571144-REG/Canon_2762B003_EOS_Rebel_XS_a_k_a_.html">$540 on B&amp;H</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
<h2>Simple Compact, midrange: Canon SD960</h2>
<p>For a midrange budget, there really aren&#8217;t any value-added propositions for moving up a size class for this user group &#8211; one may as well opt for the Canon SD960 for increased portability.  See Simple Ultracompact, midrange above for the description.</p>
<h2>Simple Compact, budget: Panasonic FS15</h2>
<p>For the budget price range, there really aren&#8217;t any value-added propositions for moving up a size class for this user group &#8211; one may as well opt for the Panasonic FS15 for increased portability.  See Simple Ultracompact, budget above for the description.</p></div>
<h1>Workhorse Full-size</h1>
<p>For many in the &#8220;avid photographer&#8221; user profile mentioned in the workhorse compact camera description, the growing interest in photography can often reach a point where taking pictures and documenting an event becomes the primary interest rather than the event itself.  As an example, rather than searching cool or fun places to visit on your next vacation, you might deliberately search for photogenic locales that will make for great photo trips.  For these users, coming away with good images supercedes the enjoyment of traveling or participating in the event itself, and thus the hassle of carrying and managing photo equipment becomes secondary to being able to capture the best images.  For these users, a <strong>workhorse full-size</strong> camera that can handle a variety of scenes and perform under even the most difficult conditions, and sacrifices no capability for size considerations, is ideal</p>
<h2>Workhorse Full-size, premium: Nikon D5000 with 18-55 VR and 55-200 VR lenses</h2>
<p><a href="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nikon-d5000.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-368" title="nikon-d5000" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nikon-d5000.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="271" /></a>The Nikon D5000 is a midrange DSLR that is a bit lighter on features compared to some higher-end models (mostly in lens compatibility and fast-action capability) but packs the same sensor internals as some of Nikon&#8217;s premium sports cameras.  It&#8217;ll provide by far the best image quality in its price range, especially when a high-ISO mode is required (fast action and low-light).  The D5000 is also one of very few DSLRs currently to feature a video mode.  The 18-55 VR and 55-200 lens combo will require some lens swapping when switching between short and long-range subjects, but together will provide an extremely versatile range that can cover just about anything.  Both also feature IS systems (Nikon calls it VR) to help cut down on camera shake.  If you don&#8217;t require a long range lens, a kit with only the 18-55 VR runs for $773.</p>
<ul>
<li>12MP resolution</li>
<li>18-55 lens: 27-83mm (3x) zoom range; 55-200 lens: 83-300mm (3.6x) zoom</li>
<li>f/3.5-5.6 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 24fps (720p) video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>560g (19.8oz) &#8211; not including lens</li>
<li>127.0 x 104.1 x 78.7 mm  (5.0 x 4.1 x 3.1 in) - not including lens</li>
<li>510 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/628096-REG/Nikon_9700_NIKON_D5000_SLR_w_18_55_55_200.html">$1000 on B&amp;H</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D5000-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Vari-angle/dp/B00267S7TQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1244335699&amp;sr=1-1">$773 on Amazon (18-55 lens only kit)</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
<h2>Workhorse Full-size, midrange: Pentax K2000 with Sigma 18-200 lens</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-372 aligncenter" title="pentax-k20002" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pentax-k20002.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="248" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-369 aligncenter" title="sigma-18-200" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sigma-18-200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="220" /></p>
<p>While not really known as one of the Big Two DSLR systems, and lacking in cameras and lenses at the very, very high-end range, the Pentax offers a solid system for those who don&#8217;t imagine themselves ever sending into $1000+ lens or $2000+ camera territory.  The K2000 delivers exceptional image quality, though the results aren&#8217;t quite as clean or punchy &#8220;out of box&#8221; as Canon or Nikon cameras.  The chief advantage of the K2000 is its low price and inclusion of an in-camera image stabilization system, which helps reduce camera shake even when used with cheaper lenses that have no lens-based IS systems.</p>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>27-300mm (11x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/3.5-6.3 aperture</li>
<li>No video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>524g (18.5oz) &#8211; not including lens</li>
<li>121.9 x 91.4 x 68.6 mm (4.8 x 3.6 x 2.7 in) - not including lens</li>
<li>640 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li>$694 total: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/610948-REG/Pentax_17311_K2000_SLR_DIGITAL_CAMERA.html">$410 on B&amp;H (camera)</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-18-200mm-3-5-6-3-Samsung-Digital/dp/B0007U00XU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1244336659&amp;sr=1-1">$284 on Amazon (18-200 lens)</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<h2>Workhouse Full-size, midrange: Panasonic FZ28</h2>
<div><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-361" title="panasonic-fz28" src="http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/panasonic-fz28.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="259" />The market for the big, hulking ultrazooms of yesteryear have somewhat evaporated in the budget and midrange categories &#8211; for the majority of consumers, the advantages of having a portable formfactor like the Panasonic TZ/ZS series cameras is so enormous that no amount of expanded features or capability would sway them towards a larger camera.  Nonetheless, there are certain advantages to larger cameras like the FZ28: even bigger &#8220;megazoom&#8221; lenses, better ergonomics (there&#8217;s much more camera to hold onto), and manual controls that often aren&#8217;t found on compact ultrazooms for marketing reasons.  While the traditional ultrazoom cameras like Canon&#8217;s S (now SX) and Sony&#8217;s H (now HX) series still exist, they&#8217;ve somewhat transitioned into a premium niche market &#8211; Panasonic&#8217;s FZ28 is just about the only one of these to be found for a reasonable sub-$300 price.</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>10MP resolution</li>
<li>27-486mm (18x) zoom range</li>
<li>f/2.8-4.4 aperture</li>
<li>1280&#215;720, 30fps video</li>
<li>Image stabilization</li>
<li>370g (13oz)</li>
<li>116.8 x 76.2 x 88.9 mm (4.6 x 3.0 x 3.5 in)</li>
<li>460 shots battery life (CIPA)</li>
<li><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-FZ28S-Digital-Stabilized-Silver/dp/B001CCTPFQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1244318627&amp;sr=1-2">$299 on Amazon</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
<h2>Workhorse Full-size, budget: Panasonic TZ4</h2>
<p>Compact ultrazooms like the TZ4 have all but wiped out the ultrazoom market in the lower price brackets &#8211; thus today you won&#8217;t find a more capable budget camera than Panasonic&#8217;s exceptional TZ4, no matter how large you&#8217;re willing to go.  See Workhorse Compact above for the description.</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shuttersounds.thedailynathan.com/2009/06/07/camera-guide-june-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

